Climategate scandal worse than most understood

If I hadn’t been one to rise same position back in 2008, due to own knowledge, I guess that this would have put everything coming from UN:s IPCC, Al Gore and so called Climate experts where it belong: IN THE NAUGHTY CORNER to be forgotten by every true scientist and most ordinary man/woman:

IMPORTANT QUOTES FROM BLOGGARTICLE:

Forget Climategate. This global warming scandal is the biggest of the lot http://t.co/XAre6JZg2M

— James Delingpole (@JamesDelingpole) January 30, 2015

If it wasn’t for the diligence of amateur investigators like retired accountant Paul Homewood, probably no one would care, not even Paraguayans, what has been going on with the Paraguayan temperature records. But Homewood has done his homework and here, revealed at his site Notalotofpeopleknowthat, is what he found.

He began by examining Paraguay’s only three genuinely rural weather stations. (ie the ones least likely to have had their readings affected over the years by urban development.)

All three – at least in the versions used by NASA GISS for their “hottest year on record” claim – show a “clear and steady” upward (warming) trend since the 1950s, with 2014 shown as the hottest year at one of the sites, Puerto Casado.

Judging by this chart all is clear: it’s getting hotter in Paraguay, just like it is everywhere else in the world.

Tempered values.
source: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/show_station.cgi?id=308860860004&dt=1&ds=1

But wait. How did the Puerto Casado chart look before the temperature data was adjusted? Rather different as you see here:

Empiric data (not ”corrected”) from http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/show_station.cgi?id=308860860004&dt=1&ds=1

Perhaps, though, Puerto Casada was an anomaly?

Nope. Similar adjustments, in the same direction, appear to have been made to the two other rural sites…..
– – – – -END of quote from bloggarticle: Forget climategate – This global warming scandal is much bigger, James Delinpoles blogg

From Klimatfrågan… Och över alltihopa lyser Moder Sol, Norah4you 25 juli 2008
Har någon någon aning om vem det var som mätte dygnsmedeltemperaturerna vid Nord- och Sydpolen innan dessa besökts av kända upptäcktsresanden? I fallet Nordpolen är det etter värre. Verkliga vetenskapliga data har inte insamlats före 1969…..

Men hur är det nu med http://maps.grida.no/go/graphic/trends-in-arctic-temperature-1880-2006 och andras av FN m.fl. presenterade arktiska temperaturer?

Innan Peary och Henson nådde Nordpolen 1909 så kan möjligen Cock varit där året innan. MEN den första vetenskapliga undersökningen till fots upp till Nordpolen fick världen vänta på till 1969.

Hur det är möjligt för någon seriös forskare att påstå att han/hon har vetenskapliga uppgifter uppmätta i Arktis annat än i ytterområden nära Ishavet från åren 1880-till 1968, det undrar fler än Norah, och svaret får vi knappast aldrig.

Någon försöker sedan ta fram alla dessa fantastiska observetioner som kommer från iskärnor…… Det är bara det att isen i Arktis precis som all annan vattenbaserad rörelse i vår värld inte ligger stilla. Centrifugalkraften och vattens naturliga cirkulation som gör att allt vatten söker sig till lägre och lägsta möjliga punkt i dess omgivning gör att om DU borrar rakt ner så får Du inte reda på hur det såg ut på platsen ens 10 år tidigare. Att erosion, vind och tempeatur, och vulkanutbrott lika väl som kärnvapensprängningar också tillsammans med variation i nedfallen snö gör att det där med iskärnor över längre tider i vissa fall kan vara ett indicium men aldrig ett bevis.Klimatfrågan… Och över alltihopa lyser Moder Sol, Norah4you 25 juli 2008

Quick English text:
Does anyone have any idea who it was who measured temperatured at the North and South poles before they are visited by humans becomming Famous Explorers? In the case of the North Pole it’s worse. True scientific data have not been able to measure before 1969 …..

So how is it now with http://maps.grida.no/go/graphic/trends-in-arctic-temperature-1880-2006 that been presented as arctic temperatures?

Before Peary and Henson reached the North Pole in 1909 so could possibly Cock been there the year before. But the first scientific survey on foot up to the North Pole, the world had to wait until 1969 for

How it is possible for any serious researcher stating that he/she has scientific data measured in the Arctic, other than in the outer areas near the Arctic Ocean from the years 1880 to 1968, the wonder more than Norah, and the answer we hardly ever.

Someone then try to develop all these great observetioner coming from ice cores …… It’s just that ice in the Arctic just like any other water movement in our world does not lie still. The centrifugal force and underwater natural circulation that allows all the water seek out lower and lowest point in its environment means that if you drill straight down so you may not find out how it looked on the site even 10 years earlier. Erosion, wind and tempeatur, and volcanic eruptions as well as nuclear explosions also accompanied by variation in the fallen snow makes it there with ice cores over longer periods in some cases may be an indication but never a proof.Klimatfrågan… Och över alltihopa lyser Moder Sol, Norah4you 25 juli 2008

Where have all the money gone? Long time passing and several CO2-pope pretenders travelled airborne in a never ending Round and round we go-circus

BTW: CO2-believers better remember that UN isn’t a world goverment. Neither is UN declared as a church no matter how many of the delegates put their faith in false profets

How many miles should a man walk by before he understand that he isn’t God?

US Media:
Federal Construction Projects Must Plan For Flood Risks From Climate Change, Nytimes.com 2015/01/31
Have they never heard of Archimedes Principle?

Swedish media:
Vill att USA bekämpar uppvärmningen, Aftonbladet 31 januari 2015
Vill att USA bekämpar uppvärmningen, SvD 31 januari 2015
Vill att USA bekämpar uppvärmning, GP 31 januari 2015

Needed information re. Facts about our Earth, not Fiction:

Please observe the minimi brown resp minimi blue dot. The brown dot represent Mount Everest (in this scale 1 mm) and the blue the Mariner Grave (in this scale 1 mm)
Please note scale Earth radie 6 378 km where each km is represented by 1 mm on map.
We humans never gone deeper than Mariner Grave no matter that we visited our Moon and sent rockets far beyond….