• Hem
  • About
  • Asylrätt enligt FN:s Mänskliga Rättigheter
  • Theories of Science
  • Studier, tips med mera (uppdaterad jan 2015)
  • Rebloggarticles from Genetiker inkl. personal comments
  • Historia

Norah4you's Weblog

Thoughts from the Swedish Westcoast

Feeds:
Inlägg
Kommentarer
« Friskola eller kommunal inte problemet
Liberalism – frihet under ansvar och under lagarna. »

Climategate scandal worse than most understood

31 januari 2015 av norah4you

If I hadn’t been one to rise same position back in 2008, due to own knowledge, I guess that this would have put everything coming from UN:s IPCC, Al Gore and so called Climate experts where it belong: IN THE NAUGHTY CORNER to be forgotten by every true scientist and most ordinary man/woman:

IMPORTANT QUOTES FROM BLOGGARTICLE:

Forget Climategate. This global warming scandal is the biggest of the lot http://t.co/XAre6JZg2M

— James Delingpole (@JamesDelingpole) January 30, 2015

If it wasn’t for the diligence of amateur investigators like retired accountant Paul Homewood, probably no one would care, not even Paraguayans, what has been going on with the Paraguayan temperature records. But Homewood has done his homework and here, revealed at his site Notalotofpeopleknowthat, is what he found.

He began by examining Paraguay’s only three genuinely rural weather stations. (ie the ones least likely to have had their readings affected over the years by urban development.)

All three – at least in the versions used by NASA GISS for their “hottest year on record” claim – show a “clear and steady” upward (warming) trend since the 1950s, with 2014 shown as the hottest year at one of the sites, Puerto Casado.

Judging by this chart all is clear: it’s getting hotter in Paraguay, just like it is everywhere else in the world.

Tempered values. source: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/show_station.cgi?id=308860860004&dt=1&ds=1

Tempered values.
source: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/show_station.cgi?id=308860860004&dt=1&ds=1

But wait. How did the Puerto Casado chart look before the temperature data was adjusted? Rather different as you see here:

Empiric data (not "corrected") from http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/show_station.cgi?id=308860860004&dt=1&ds=1

Empiric data (not ”corrected”) from http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/show_station.cgi?id=308860860004&dt=1&ds=1

Perhaps, though, Puerto Casada was an anomaly?

Nope. Similar adjustments, in the same direction, appear to have been made to the two other rural sites…..
– – – – -END of quote from bloggarticle: Forget climategate – This global warming scandal is much bigger, James Delinpoles blogg

From Klimatfrågan… Och över alltihopa lyser Moder Sol, Norah4you 25 juli 2008
Har någon någon aning om vem det var som mätte dygnsmedeltemperaturerna vid Nord- och Sydpolen innan dessa besökts av kända upptäcktsresanden? I fallet Nordpolen är det etter värre. Verkliga vetenskapliga data har inte insamlats före 1969…..

Men hur är det nu med http://maps.grida.no/go/graphic/trends-in-arctic-temperature-1880-2006 och andras av FN m.fl. presenterade arktiska temperaturer?

Innan Peary och Henson nådde Nordpolen 1909 så kan möjligen Cock varit där året innan. MEN den första vetenskapliga undersökningen till fots upp till Nordpolen fick världen vänta på till 1969.

Hur det är möjligt för någon seriös forskare att påstå att han/hon har vetenskapliga uppgifter uppmätta i Arktis annat än i ytterområden nära Ishavet från åren 1880-till 1968, det undrar fler än Norah, och svaret får vi knappast aldrig.

Någon försöker sedan ta fram alla dessa fantastiska observetioner som kommer från iskärnor…… Det är bara det att isen i Arktis precis som all annan vattenbaserad rörelse i vår värld inte ligger stilla. Centrifugalkraften och vattens naturliga cirkulation som gör att allt vatten söker sig till lägre och lägsta möjliga punkt i dess omgivning gör att om DU borrar rakt ner så får Du inte reda på hur det såg ut på platsen ens 10 år tidigare. Att erosion, vind och tempeatur, och vulkanutbrott lika väl som kärnvapensprängningar också tillsammans med variation i nedfallen snö gör att det där med iskärnor över längre tider i vissa fall kan vara ett indicium men aldrig ett bevis.Klimatfrågan… Och över alltihopa lyser Moder Sol, Norah4you 25 juli 2008

Quick English text:
Does anyone have any idea who it was who measured temperatured at the North and South poles before they are visited by humans becomming Famous Explorers? In the case of the North Pole it’s worse. True scientific data have not been able to measure before 1969 …..

So how is it now with http://maps.grida.no/go/graphic/trends-in-arctic-temperature-1880-2006 that been presented as arctic temperatures?

Before Peary and Henson reached the North Pole in 1909 so could possibly Cock been there the year before. But the first scientific survey on foot up to the North Pole, the world had to wait until 1969 for

How it is possible for any serious researcher stating that he/she has scientific data measured in the Arctic, other than in the outer areas near the Arctic Ocean from the years 1880 to 1968, the wonder more than Norah, and the answer we hardly ever.

Someone then try to develop all these great observetioner coming from ice cores …… It’s just that ice in the Arctic just like any other water movement in our world does not lie still. The centrifugal force and underwater natural circulation that allows all the water seek out lower and lowest point in its environment means that if you drill straight down so you may not find out how it looked on the site even 10 years earlier. Erosion, wind and tempeatur, and volcanic eruptions as well as nuclear explosions also accompanied by variation in the fallen snow makes it there with ice cores over longer periods in some cases may be an indication but never a proof.Klimatfrågan… Och över alltihopa lyser Moder Sol, Norah4you 25 juli 2008

Where have all the money gone? Long time passing and several CO2-pope pretenders travelled airborne in a never ending Round and round we go-circus

BTW: CO2-believers better remember that UN isn’t a world goverment. Neither is UN declared as a church no matter how many of the delegates put their faith in false profets

How many miles should a man walk by before he understand that he isn’t God?

US Media:
Federal Construction Projects Must Plan For Flood Risks From Climate Change, Nytimes.com 2015/01/31
Have they never heard of Archimedes Principle?

Swedish media:
Vill att USA bekämpar uppvärmningen, Aftonbladet 31 januari 2015
Vill att USA bekämpar uppvärmningen, SvD 31 januari 2015
Vill att USA bekämpar uppvärmning, GP 31 januari 2015

Needed information re. Facts about our Earth, not Fiction:

Please observe the minimi brown resp minimi blue dot. The brown dot represent Mount Everest (in this scale 1 mm) and the blue the Mariner Grave (in this scale 1 mm) Please note scale Earth radie 6 378 km where each km is represented by 1 mm on map. We humans never gone deeper than Mariner Grave no matter that we visited our Moon and sent rockets far beyond….

Please observe the minimi brown resp minimi blue dot. The brown dot represent Mount Everest (in this scale 1 mm) and the blue the Mariner Grave (in this scale 1 mm)
Please note scale Earth radie 6 378 km where each km is represented by 1 mm on map.
We humans never gone deeper than Mariner Grave no matter that we visited our Moon and sent rockets far beyond….

Share this:

  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • E-post
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Gilla

Gilla Laddar in …

Relaterade

Publicerat i "Climate threat", Education, Environmental Questions, Fysik, Geografi, Historia, History, Humaniora, Journalistik, Kemi, Matematik, Politic, Theories of Science, Vetenskapsteori | Taggad Antarctic, Antarktis, Archimedes princip, Arctic, Arctic Ice Sheet extent, Arktis, Climategate Scandal, CO2, Environmental Politics, Environmental Questions, Fotosyntes, Geografi, Geografi för 7:e klassare avsnitt Jorden, Geologi, Historia, IPCC, Istäcke Antarktis, Istäcke Arktis, Jordens geologi, Klimatbluffen, Klimathotet, Kolets Kretslopp, Measured temperature Antarctica, Miljö, Miljöfrågan, Miljöpolitik, Miljövård, Oceanografi, Okunniga Politiker, Politik, sc. Climate scientists, sk. CO2 hotet, sk. Klimatforskare, sk. Klimathotet, Skattepolitik a la MP, Skogsbränderna har inte blivit fler, Teori kontra verklighet, Theories of Science, Uppmätt temperatur Antarktis, Uppmätt temperatur Arktis, Vattnets kretslopp, Vetenskapsteori, Vulcanos, Vulkaner, Vulkaners Historia, When the fox counts the chicken | 4 kommentarer

4 svar

  1. på 02 februari 2015 den 4:08 SasjaL

    Reblogga detta på SasjaL och kommenterade:

    Well, there’s another good example in the temperature data of Bolivia. So far, I have not seen anywhere these data have been used by AGW’ers. Why? An not so far off answer is that this data can’t be adjusted enough to ‘justify’ the AGW mantra about a warming world.

    Regarding the graphs above, the first thing that’s striking me (as usual), is the extremely short time intervals. This is an ”red line” issue not only found among (C)AGW’ers but also among some ”sceptics”, unfortunately. Anyone schooled in the basics of statistics do understand this, at least should and if a researcher/scientist have the slightest amount of professionalism and/or seriously, this is avoided at any cost. When money (fraud) (and/) or plain ignorance is involved, it isn’t.

    When we’re talking about climate, the hole relevant time span is more then three billion years long. Short time span like six and a half decades are statistically insignificant. Especially when it has to do with cyclic events. In this case, the high frequency signals are statistically plain noise, due to the large difference compared to the low frequency signals and of barely no interest in the ”Big Picture”! The low frequency signals are the ”strong” ones.

    In nature there are a number of more or less concurrent cycles. If one or several cycles with the lowest frequency (i.e. with the longest period length) are ignored in analysing, the outcome will vary with the section of the period chosen for study, even if someone tries to suggest otherwise. Something important to recognize and to remember: We perceive a person’s lifetime as a long period of time, but in a geological and in a galactic perspective, it’s not even a small parenthesis. This is exploited by unscrupulous politicians and scientists …

    As the ”Big Picture” (i.e. global climate) isn’t fully understood by anyone and for that to happen, it requires that all cycles are detected and all the relationships are established. Before that no one can predict the future climate. However, we have a slight clue if we look at what has happen at previous ice age periods. That particular data is available, but few cares. Also, if the global climate is fully understood, we will be able to perform reliable weather forecasts long ahead and that isn’t possible today for longer time then five days. These forecasts has to be constantly adjusted. With the proper knowledge, there’s no need for adjustments. The northern part of Europe was inhabitable twelve thousand years ago and that will happen again, with genuine climate refugees as a result.

    (Notes that it is common for English-speaking politicians to be blunt and reduce ‘carbon dioxide’ to ‘coal’, which confuses the Swedish television in translations. So they translate it into plane ‘coal’, signalling that they missed (like the politicians) what they would have learned in elementary school …)

    Regarding UN, there are a lot of politicians around the world that would like it to be or even believes it is a world government. Not least within the UN …

    Regarding the UN, there are many politicians around the world who want it to be a world government, others thinks it is. Not least within the UN and its sub-organizations (IPCC and others) …

    GillaGilla


    • på 02 februari 2015 den 4:19 norah4you

      UN never was, isn’t and never will be a world goverment. That would be against intentions in Human Rights. Why? That one was simple: Freedom of Speach and Freedom to vote according to your own judgement is the garant-parts for any kind of democracy. It takes to take that away or manipulate votes same way the CO2-believers done with temperatures to reach a result where UN would have a change to become a World Goverment, but only IF they choose Dictatureship instead of Democracy.

      GillaGilla


    • på 03 februari 2015 den 0:57 SasjaL

      I noticed that my dyslexia got the final word …

      I wrote in the third last paragraph: ”(Notes that it is common for English-speaking politicians to be blunt and reduce ‘carbon dioxide’ to ‘coal’, …)”, but it should be:

      ”(Notes that it is common for English-speaking politicians to be blunt and reduce ‘carbon dioxide’ to ‘carbon’, …)”

      The second last paragraph shouldn’t be there …

      GillaGilla


      • på 03 februari 2015 den 4:59 norah4you

        Well that happens in the best families that something is placed on the table that ought not to have been.

        GillaGilla



Kommentarer är stängda.

  • Sök inlägg

  • Senaste inläggen

    • Utdrag samt länk till Harkling: Gängkriminaliteten i Göteborg
    • Reblogg från Harkling: Censur på Bokmässan
    • A link to Australian Working Dog Resque
    • Telia, vakna upp det är 2016 nu!
    • Rebloggat från Harkling: Röd journalistik – mer åsikt än kunskap?
    • Utanförskap börjar i hemmet! (uppdaterad 19 Augusti 2016)
    • Utanförskap ingen ursäkt för att bränna bilar!
    • Största misstag? Aida Hadzialic (S)?????
    • Sverige var fantastiskt…. och vårt Försvar var gott.
    • Stopp och belägg. Kvinnor kan, vill och törs 2016 precis som på 70-talet
  • Senaste kommentarerna

    • norah4you om Utdrag samt länk till Harkling: Gängkriminaliteten i Göteborg
    • non-PKman om Utdrag samt länk till Harkling: Gängkriminaliteten i Göteborg
  • Mest lästa inlägg

    • Skillnaden mellan Volvos och Saabs
    • Ord och inga visor - "Sverige har förstört sitt skolsystem"
    • Ni är för roliga, Klimatfantaster
    • Ministerstyre inte tillåtet i Sverige!
    • Kvinnor är myndiga, liksom männen
    • Finstilta i avtal, vad är det?
    • Media okunniga eller födda igår?
  • Kategorier

  • Sidor

    • About
      • Aktuell debatt
        • Aktuell debatt 2014
        • Aktuell debatt t.o.m. 2013
        • Barn, föräldrar och samhället
          • Curlingföräldrar
          • V70-föräldrar
        • Eftervalsdebatt Val 2014
        • Finansstupet
        • Göteborgsröran
        • Klimathotet
          • Geologi
          • Några fakta o källor CO2-troende glömt
          • When the fox counts the chickens….
        • Mellanöster
        • Miljöfrågan
          • FAKTA SOM ALLA BÖR KÄNNA TILL
            • FACTS FOR EVERYONE TO BE AWARE OF, even those who believe in the CO-2 threat
          • Rent vatten
            • Verkligt problem – Rent Vatten
          • Stormen Sandy
        • Miljöfrågan – Rent vatten
          • Arktis historia
          • Fakta om jorden
          • True history of Greenpeace
        • Val 2014 Sverige
        • Yttrandefriheten
          • Fri- och Rättigheter BEGRÄNSNINGAR
          • When God gives love
    • Asylrätt enligt FN:s Mänskliga Rättigheter
    • Historia
      • Grönland
      • Teodrik/Theoderic den store
      • Vreta Klosters kungahistoria
    • Rebloggarticles from Genetiker inkl. personal comments
    • Studier, tips med mera (uppdaterad jan 2015)
      • Samhällskunskap
      • Studietekniska tips m.m.
        • Kurslitteratur och tilläggslitteratur
        • Matematikex. från 1 klass Realskolan
    • Theories of Science
      • Begreppsteori
      • Källkritik, källanalys sammanhang
      • Källkritisk analys – Sanning och konsekvens
      • Värdegrundteorier
  • Skriv in din epostadress för att prenumerera på den här bloggen och därmed få information om nya inlägg via epost.

    Gör sällskap med 256 andra följare

Blogg på WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Integritet och cookies: Den här webbplatsen använder cookies. Genom att fortsätta använda den här webbplatsen godkänner du deras användning.
Om du vill veta mer, inklusive hur du kontrollerar cookies, se: Cookie-policy
  • Följ Följer
    • Norah4you's Weblog
    • Gör sällskap med 256 andra följare
    • Har du redan ett WordPress.com-konto? Logga in nu.
    • Norah4you's Weblog
    • Anpassa
    • Följ Följer
    • Registrera
    • Logga in
    • Kopiera kortlänk
    • Rapportera detta innehåll
    • Visa inlägg i läsare
    • Hantera prenumerationer
    • Minimera detta fält
 

Laddar in kommentarer …
 

    loading Avbryt
    Inlägget skickades inte – kontrollera dina e-postadresser!
    E-postkontroll misslyckades, försök igen
    Tyvärr, din blogg kan inte dela inlägg via e-post.
    %d bloggare gillar detta: