Feeds:
Inlägg
Kommentarer

Posts Tagged ‘Greenpeace’

Please note following from the bloggarticle:

The organization I co-founded has become a monster. When I was a member of its central committee in the early days, we campaigned – usually with success – on genuine environmental issues such as atmospheric nuclear tests, whaling and seal-clubbing.

When Greenpeace turned anti-science by campaigning against chlorine (imagine the sheer stupidity of campaigning against one of the elements in the periodic table), I decided that it had lost its purpose and that, having achieved its original objectives, had turned to extremism to try to justify its continued existence.

Now Greenpeace has knowingly made itself the sworn enemy of all life on Earth. By opposing capitalism, it stands against the one system of economics that has been most successful in regulating and restoring the environment.

By opposing the use of DDT inside the homes of children exposed to the anopheles mosquito that carries malaria, Greenpeace contributed to the deaths of 40 million people and counting, most of them children. It now pretends it did not oppose DDT, but the record shows otherwise. On this as on so many issues, it got the science wrong. It has the deaths of those children on what passes for its conscience.

I have written a Swedish bloggarticle regarding Greenpeace not being a Goverment of the World not an elected Parlament or any kind of Official Administration: Greenpeace ingen världsregering

Greenpeace is not what they try to tell the World.

Neither is COP21 what it looks like. They may be in for a new suggested agreement. They haven’t education enough or so they would like us to belive(?) to understand the simple fact THERE IS NO CO2- or CLIMATE-THREAT.

That’s said, we do have a much larger problem they should have understood they needs to look into. We polute our Water and Air not only with industrial emission but with thousands of chemical ”spills” we have no clue what so ever how they react together under different Ph-figures and/or temperatures.

So Where have all the money gone, so called experts at IPCC and politicians visiting COP21 in Paris…..

Swedish newspaper: Klimatmötet: Nytt avtalsutkast klart, GP 9 December 2015

Letter bloggarticle: Monsieur le Ministre President Hollande, Norah4you 2015/12/01

Look also at:
BREAKING: Greenpeace co-founder reports Greenpeace to the FBI under RICO and wire-fraud statutes, via sasjal.wordpress.com 8 December 2015

Watts Up With That?

‘Greenpeace has made itself the sworn enemy of all life on Earth’

By Dr. Patrick Moore, a co-founder of Greenpeace

Greenpeace, in furtherance of what is in effect its war against every species on the planet, has now turned to what, on the face of things, looks to me like outright breach of the RICO, wire-fraud, witness-tampering and obstruction-of-committee statutes. I have called in the FBI.

Greenpeace appears to have subjected Dr Will Happer, Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics at Princeton University, to a maladroit attempt at entrapment that has badly backfired on it.

clip_image002 Greenpeace used this dismal rent-by-the-hour office block in the Beirut souk for its entrapment scam

The organization I co-founded has become a monster. When I was a member of its central committee in the early days, we campaigned – usually with success – on genuine environmental issues such as atmospheric nuclear tests, whaling and seal-clubbing.

View original post 2 053 fler ord

Read Full Post »

Consensus is a political term – has nothing what so ever to do with science!
Empiri is reality – corrected data used in computer models NEVER EVER is anything bad: Bad input leads to Bad output. That was we systemprogrammers said back in early 1970’s!

Obama unveils major climate change proposal, cnn.com August 3 2015
“Clean Power Plan:” Pres. Obama unveils major climate change proposal, Gov. Walker responds, fox6now.com 2015/08/03

Almost correct facts can be found in one source for data used by IPCC here it is:

Arctic Sea Ice Extant 5 August 2015

BTW…. this gives every single Polar Bear more than 281 square kilometers each to walk alone on! Not at all the lowest value last 30 year…. I guess you know that this means that each Polar Bear have 50% more area to walk on than the area of Washington DC…. 😛

If you President Obama aren’t familiar with Standard Deviations here is the definition:

Standard Deviation

The Standard Deviation is a measure of how spread out numbers are.

Its symbol is σ (the greek letter sigma)

In other word every value up and down from any kind om mean (there are more than one) that falls within the Standard Deviation, is normal – not abnormal in any way…..

Btw the talk that this years reading was the lowest since 1981 in July is a false statement due to corrected not empiric data. I have all the figures needed and same type of ”reading” via satelites show that the lowest empiric value was back in 2006…. as written in the wattsup blogg I have written comments to in Rebogged article – Ocean Heat: New Study Shows Climate Scientists Can Still Torture Data until the Data Confess, wattsup with that 26 July 2015

YOU HAVE BEEN MADE A FOOL PRESIDENT OBAMA
That’s sad

The CO2-belivers belive but Faith has to do with religion or Faith in a human. They never learnt higher Math, especially not Mathematic Theories, Analyses and never understood that in order to write a systemprogram and or the simplest algoritm, one need to take all important parameters that needs to be answered true into consideration. 7 to 12 of at least 43 NEEDED parameters makes as I wrote above Bad input leads to Bad output. Simple as that.

Science axioms

In Theories of Science it’s never ever possible to prove a thesis right. Only to falsify a thesis

This follows of the most important axiom in Theories of Science:

Each time/period in history needs to rethink and revaluated old accepted theories and thesis from new ”days” advancing analyse methods and/or new facts brought to the ”table”.

Remember that one single black dot on a white paper makes the paper non-white. One single contradiction in a theory is enough for that theory/thesis to be proven wrong.

One single artifact and or factor found in an unexpected place always needs to be folly explained. Or that single artifact/factor leads up to necessarity of formulating a new thesis which includes new knowledge.
Same for thesis in History and Archaeology as for thesis in so called Natural Science.
Implications of falsified Thesis

There are several Fallacies in argumentation, Norah4science page English text to be taken into account when ever someone calls for ”consensus”. Consensus is a political term with no connection what so ever to Theories of Science.

Read Full Post »

Nu försöker WWF igen – existerar inget klimathot inget hot mot Arktis is eller Antarktis; inte ens senaste dumheten – påståendet att visst slags köttätande skulle skada klimatet håller vatten. Inte ens om det hade existerat ett klimathot. Värsta boven är vulkaner på och i vatten när det gäller CO2 och andra växthusgaser. Men vad gäller födan är risodling värre än allt annat även om det inte varit så många som äter ris…..
Klimatet på jorden förändras hela tiden. Alla WWF:s påståenden har motbevisats gång på gång av verkliga forskare som vet att vetenskapsteori är nödvändig.
Många rödljus i ny köttguide, Aftonbladet 27 maj 2015
Ny köttguide ska hjälpa konsumenter, DN 27 maj 2015

Observera att nu talar de om guide….. de har inte ens på fötter för en guide – stor skillnad mellan att ha fått utbildning och bildning….

Konsensus är förresten en politisk term som INTE en vetenskaplig!

Påståendet att Arktis is smälter så det skulle vara risk för isbjörnar – BLUFF och BÅG
Den 17 maj 2015 hade varje enskild isbjörn 527 kvadratkilometer av Arktis is till sitt förfogande….. I ytstorlek är det mer än 60 kvadratkilometer större än Andorras yta…… 😛

Arctic Sea Ice Area 17 maj 2015

Minns ni påståendet om att Golfströmmen saktar fart. Påstående som kommit gång på gång senaste 10 åren….. Verkligheten en annan: Norwegian observation confirms the Guld Stream has been stable over the past 20 years, wattsupwiththat 2015/05/23

Det går att räkna upp ett stort antal utsagor som WWF har kommit med under åren och som är motbevisade gång på gång.

Norah4you's Weblog

Ärligt talat. Hur kan Ni i WWF med att försöka bluffa folk? Det var varmare på bronsåldern, då var det så varmt som era sk. experter påstår det skall bli om några hundra år.

Är Ni helt födda igår? Konsensus är en politisk term, inget som har med vetenskap att göra? som inte är förankrat i Vetenskapsteori. Det enda Ni lyckas visa upp i debattartiklar som Klimatfrågan kräver ett nytt ledarskap, Niklas Gustavsson Chief Sustainability Officer, Volvokoncernen; Rob Jenkinson Director, Corporate Sustainability, SKF; Håkan Wirtén generalsekreterare WWF samt Mariann Eriksson marknadschef WWF på GP debatt 4 maj 2015 Det enda Ni lyckas visa upp är fullständig okunskap om allt från tektoniska plattor, jordens vobbling m.m. till något så urbota enkelt att förstå för alla som kan tänka, det som kallas Archimedes princip

Ja redan de gamle grekerna kunde mer fakta om Jorden än vad Ni tycks kunna. För den grundläggande…

View original post 663 fler ord

Read Full Post »

Alldeles för många tror idag att intresseorganisationer som WWF för att de har närmare 5 miljoner individer som anslutit sig till WWF skulle vara en garanti för vetenskaplighet samt obundenhet – må vara att WWF inte har någon partipolitisk färg, officiellt sett i varje fall, men obundet är varken WWF eller Greenpeace.

Faktiska uppgifter om WWF

Från WWF:s egen sida: Världsnaturfonden WWF är en helt oberoende och partipolitiskt obunden miljö- och naturvårdsorganisation som bildades 1961.Om WWF, www.wwf.se Tyvärr sysslar WWF med desinformation – Uppgiften som WWF-s rubrik WWF – världens naturvårdsorganisation är i sig ren och skär falsk uppgift!

WWF är inte på något sätt representerat som organisation bland Världens bästa universitet. WWF är INGEN Världsregering och inte demokratiskt valda representanter, inte heller är det så att den är det den påstår sig vara ”Världens” naturvårdsorganisation.
– WWF har inte den funktionen. Aldrig varit tänkt så….WWF är och förblir en intresseorganisation oavsett hur många enskilda som ansluter sig till den Notera att mindre än 7% av jordens befolkning är medlemmar om officiella siffror är riktiga.WWF är ingen demokratiskt vald församling – endast intresseorganisation

Greenpeace real history

Greenpeace was born to be an organization for environment and against Nuclear veapon.

Among the founder was:

* Bill Darnell a carpenter and an ecologist, what ever that means….; then there were of course

* Dorothy Stowe was a social justice advocate and American Quaker. Dorothy Stowe who died in 2010 married Irving Strasmich, lawyer, in 1953. Irving Strasmich graduated magna cum laude from Brown University in Economics before he studied law at Yale. Together the couple decided to change name to Stowe

* Paul Cote a law student and peace activist.

Together with Jim Bohlen, Paul Cote and Dorothy Stowe started by founding ”Don’t Make a Wave Committee” in 1969 officially established early 1970. Later that anti-nuclear committee evolved into Greenpeace.

* Jim Bohlen American engineer (worked with Atlas ICBM program during a period). After being involved from the early days of ‘Don’t Make a Wave Committee’ Jim Bohlen outmanovered many high profile members in the Greenpeace that came to be an autonom organization. Among those Bohlen outmanovered was Paul Watson who in 1969 joined a Sierra group protesting against Nuclear tests, Nuclear plants and Nuclear weapon. Paul Watson later became involved in NPD New Democratic Party, a Socialdemokratic party. Jim Bohlen himself died in 2010.
…….

Sometimes today Greenpeace forget to speak of their own origin. The activists from early days were autonom leftwingers themselves but tried to establish themselves as a non Governmental organization working for Environmental questions.True history of Greenpeace

– – – – – –
Behöver varje isbjörn mer än 568 kvadratkilometer var att promenera runt på? Det är den yta varje isbjörn hade 5 maj 2015….. dvs. mer än 100 kvadratkilometer var än om isbjörnen fått gå runt på Seychellernas öar…. 😛

Read Full Post »

Rekordvarmt 2014 – högst uppmätta medeltemperaturen, DN 2 januari 2015

SMHI har glömt bort att såväl de som Tema Vatten i Linköping tackade nej till korrekt uppmätta värden i mitten på 1990-talet då jag, just det JAG, fick i uppdrag att förmedla dessa till Er!!!
Resultatet av Era ”korrigerade värden” är så långt från sanningen som tänkas kan. Ni har faktiskt själva avslöjat förfalskningarna i:

Från Forskning och Framsteg: ”Vår rekonstruktion av vinter- och vårtemperaturens variationer över ett halvt årtusende visas i bild 1. Mätningarna efter 1860 är korrigerade för den artificiella uppvärmning som orsakats av staden Stockholms tillväxt, så att kurvan visar de mer naturliga förändringarna.” Referens Forskning och Framsteg nr 5 2008, 500 års väder.

Svenska medias journalister som går CO2-mytens ärenden, måste antingen sovit på såväl biologi som fysiklektionerna i högstadiet för att inte tala om att de inte ens klarat ut att ta med sig Vattnets Kretslopp och Fotosyntes som de lärde i 4:an och 5:an. Vad lärde de sig under skolåren?

Uppfinningar kan minska utsläppen av koldioxid, SvD Ledarsidan uppdaterad 4 januari 2015

Vattnets kretslopp

Vattnets kretslopp Ingår i det elever skall lära sig redan i 4:an-5:an

Vattnets kretslopp
Ingår i det elever skall lära sig redan i 4:an-5:an

Fotosyntes
Enkelt uttryckt är det så att den syre vi andas till stor del kommer från jordens lungor de gröna växterna. Många tycks ha glömt att det är större problem att bygga på platser där träd ha stått eller hugga ner träd och växtlighet, oavsett om detta är i urskog, norra halvklotets barr- och lövskogar eller mindre träd och buskar i tätorternas alltmer glesnande parkar som äts upp av bostads och industribyggnader, för det är Fotosyntesen som ger oss människor det syre vi behöver. För CO2 är det som växterna ‘äter’ och lämnar oss syre och själva gör socker av kolet…. kol är också energi för växterna.

FOTOSYNTESENS KEMI
Ordformel för fotosyntesen:
koldioxid + vatten + ljusenergi → socker + syrgas
Kemisk formel för fotosyntesen:
6CO2 + 6H2O + hν → C6H12O6 + 6O2
· CO2 alltså från atmosfären (eller i form av karbonater från vattnet)
· H2O från rötterna

SAMMANFATTNING:
CO2 som finns i atmosfären (och/eller i form av karbonater från vattnet) samt H2O som sugs upp av rötterna i gröna växter ger oss människor syre vi behöver för att andas. Processen kallas Fotosyntes och utgör en av grundkunskaperna som alla skall ha fått lära sig förstå innan sitt 7:e skolår. Dvs. förstå processen redan innan kemilektioner som ger kemiska formeln för processen lärs ut under senare skolår.
Fotosyntes

– – – – –

PS. Jag var även närvarande när min far, då ansvarig på styret för luft o vattenfrågorna, förklarade för SMHI:s folk året efter att SMHI byggt i Norrköping att det inte var möjligt att jämföra de värden som mätts på Bråvalla Flygflottilj utifrån flygets nivåbehov med de som SMHI tänkt att fortsätta mäta inne i Norrköping. BAKLÄXA för jag finns och Ni skall inte försöka bluffa vidare!!!

https://twitter.com/IngerNorah4you/status/550965623505682432

Norah4you's Weblog

De använder sig av Mauna Loa, aktiv vulkan på Hawaii, som h u v u d k ä l l a till alla CO2 mätningar runt jorden som kalibreras/korrigeras (hm förvanskas rent ut sagt) utifrån värden mätta på en vulkansida…… tänk om forskarna lärt sig lite geologi, fysik och kemi – dvs inte snuttifikations djupdykningar utan den helhetsgrund de skulle behövt för att förstå det varje 7:e klassare läser i ämnet geografi, om än i förbifarten om de inte lär sig texterna utantill 😛

För vad är det som gäller för en vulkan? Här hänvisar jag till bloggartikeln
Sätta räven att räkna hönsen, Norah4you 11 augusti 2010 :
””På ett år gasar Etna av mer än 1 milj ton svaveldioxid (som fräter på armeringen i den bro som skall byggas över Messinasundet) och mer än 10 milj ton koldioxid, men när vulkanen har utbrott tiodubblas mängderna under den tid…

View original post 891 fler ord

Read Full Post »

IPCC advocates nuclear power to reduce greenhouse effect by Human CO2 impact

Today November 11, 2014 the cards of IPCC finally is up on the table – and from Swedish Professors who continue to believe in AWG and Climate Change…..

The professors a sad case. That they manage to place the real reason why IPCC and others were fooled to believe in a CO2-threat that doesn’t exist , well that’s good.
B.t.w. why didn’t the funding companies and organization behind the false information give the true reason – or is it only a few who been told why that’s the real reason…..

IPCC förordar kärnkraft för att minska utsläppen, Prof. Ane Håkansson, Prof. Jan Ottosson, Fil. Dr Staffan Qvist, Fil.Dr Sophie Graphe, Tekn. Dr Carl Hellesen, Tekn. dr. Mattias Lantz, Prof Stephan Pomp; SvD Brännpunkt 11 november 2014 Btw. they are part in the case….

Most of them are working at Uppsala University Inst. Physics and Astronomy, tillämpad Fysik…..
and Prof Ane Håkansson has been working close to Nordic Academy for Nuclear Safety and Security (NANSS) NANSS Seminar June 10.11.2013

Now we know WHY but we still haven’t found the full answer to the big question: Where have all the money gone?

Antarctic sea ice extent September 19 2014 Larger than ever observed before

Antarctic sea ice extent September 19 2014
Larger than ever observed before

Sea Ice Extent 15 oktober 2014 Istäcke Arktis oktober 15, 2014. följ röda linjen i mitten

Sea Ice Extent 15 oktober 2014
Istäcke Arktis oktober 15, 2014. följ röda linjen i mitten

Watts Up With That?

One of the greatest inanities that occurs in the climate wars is the claim that skeptics are lavishly funded by ”big oil” or other political interests. t is a claim that is made multiple times daily and blogs and newspaper articles and magazine articles and yet where is the evidence that such a thing is a reality?

I’m often targeted as being in the pay of one of those interest and yet when you look at my reality I had to beg for help to get to Bristol, to visit the Mann and Cook lectures. I relied on the good graces of our daily readers for which I thank you.

So with this huge disparity it struck me as ironic that this ad appeared at the top of WUWT today. It likely appeared because I’m traveling and came from a new IP address. I had never seen it before but…

View original post 183 fler ord

Read Full Post »

Behöver Ni pengar eller vad är det frågan om. Respektera länders lagar gör Ni inte. Inte heller respekterar Ni internationella avtal och lagar. Om Ni hade hållt Er enbart till kärnkraftsfrågan, så som den en gång var formulerad av Er, så hade Ni haft någon tilltro kvar. True history of Greenpeace, Norah4you sida

Efter årens vänster om vänsternissar som ni haft här i Sverige och Internationellt som pläderat för ett icke existerande Klimathot, så saknar Ni all rim och reson! Vad har Ni gjort av de pengar Ni samlat in mot klimathotet ?
Det ser hoppfullt ut för klimatet trots allt, Annika Jacobson chef för Greenpeace i Sverige, debattartikel GP debatt 31 december 2013 var spiken i kistan för Er desinformation om klimatet. Verkligheten var då artikeln skrevs helt annan än Era fantasier. Om verklig situation i Arktis där polarisen som vanligt under denna årstiden växer till sig (snart 559 kvadratkilometer per isbjörn) vänligen seArctic Sea Extent 30 december 2013
…… utdrag ur Sluta ljuga Greenpeace, Norah4you 31 december 2013
skall vi gå vidare i verkligheten om klimatet? Läs då Satellites show no global warming for 17 years 5 months, wattsupwiththat.com 2014/02/16

När det gäller kärnkraft, så är det självfallet så att det inte är ofarligt. MEN inget av de alternativa källorna som Ni och andra vänsternissar föreslagit är realistiska. Om man räknar på åtgång av energi för att få aggregat på plats samt underhåll, dvs allt från brytning av metaller till vägar som byggs för att skapa vindkraftverkanläggningar till energi åtgång för vågkraftverk på plats och i drift, så tar det som minst 15 normalt 25 år innan någon av anläggningarna producerar mer energi än det totalt gått åt att få dem på plats. Nu är kärnkraft idag inte samma som kärnkraft igår. Röstade själv mot kärnkraft när det begav sig. Men det finns inget realistiskt alternativ utöver solkraft och då inte överallt. Självfallet bör kärnkraft ersättas så fort det är realistiskt möjligt. Men det kan inte ske inom den närmaste 25-40 års perioden!

Oaktat detta, så gäller Svenska Lagar i Sverige. De gäller även tyck som jag-Greenpeacefolk! Är det till dessa olagliga aktioner som Era insamlade pengar gått? Eller? Redovisa! Ni är ingen myndighet, inget världsorgan och absolut inte några verkliga specialister, experter eller seriösa forskare. Ni är och förblir en INTRESSEORGANISATION som genomför OLAGLIGA AKTIONER. Inget annat! Vem ger Er pengarna till Era aktioner? Inte ens Era insamlingar kan täcka hela kostnaderna!

Flera gripna efter kränkraftintrång, GP 5 mars 2014
Här tar sig aktivisterna upp på kärnkraftverket, Expressen 5 mars 2014
Flera gripna efter kärnkraftsintrång, SvD 5 mars 2014
Greenpeaceaktion mot Oskarshamn, DN 5 mars 2014
Flera gripna efter kärnkraftsintrång, Aftonbladet 5 mars 2014
Dagens dyraste selfie står Ni i Greenpeace för – att dokumentera sitt brott är knappast gratis, att sprida det säger allt. Här tar aktivisterna sig in på kärnkraftverket, Expressen.se/tv 5 mars 2014

Ni i Greenpeace av idag är inga hjältar bara rena skälmar! Börja i stället med att propagera mot användning av plast i plastpåsar m.m.

Read Full Post »

While reading an excellent bloggarticle on wattsupwiththat, I noticed a link that say all about the CO2-alarmists incapacity of theories of Science. Read the quotes and links below as well as The planetary tidal influence on climate fiasco strong armed science tactics are overkill due process would work better, wattsupwiththat.com 2014/01/17 the discussion there is more than interesting…

Please remember that supressing true facts aren’t the best way of putting forward an unrealistic scenario!

extraordinary news, the scientific journal Pattern Recognition in Physics has been unexpectedly terminated, a “drastic decision” taken just ten months after it started.

The publisher appears to be shocked that in a recent special issue the scientists expressed doubt about the accelerated warming predicted by the IPCC. For the crime of not bowing before the sacred tabernacle, apparently the publishers suddenly felt the need to distance themselves, and in the most over-the-top way. The reasons they gave had nothing to do with the data, the logic, and they cite no errors. There can be no mistake, this is about enforcing a permitted line of thought.Science paper doubts IPCC so whole journal gets terminated, joannenova.com.aug 2014 january A skeptic blogg. Yes, so one needs to go back to basic. True origin lines from journal itself….

Please read the text of the journal:
Recently, a special issue was compiled entitled “Pattern in solar variability, their planetary origin and terrestrial impacts”. Besides papers dealing with the observed patterns in the heliosphere, the special issue editors ultimately submitted their conclusions in which they “doubt the continued, even accelerated, warming as claimed by the IPCC project” (Pattern Recogn. Phys., 1, 205–206, 2013).

Copernicus Publications published the work and other special issue papers to provide the spectrum of the related papers to the scientists for their individual judgment. Following best practice in scholarly publishing, published articles cannot be removed afterwards.

We at Copernicus Publications wish to distance ourselves from the apparent misuse of the originally agreed aims & scope of the journal and decided on 17 January 2014 to cease the publication of PRP. Of course, scientific dispute is controversial and should allow contradictory opinions which can then be discussed within the scientific community. However, the recent developments including the expressed implications (see above) have led us to this drastic decision
Termination of the journal Pattern Recognition in Physics, Pattern recognistion in physics january 2014

As I written before:
”Weather is and has always been a much more complicated thing to make a forecast of than CO2-believers have understood. There are so many more factors involved than are included in so called data models.

Please observe this:
Extent for North Pole Ice 31 december 2013 12.341.252 km2

Compare this with the Area of United States of America approx 9.830.000 km2
This gives us the fact that the Sea Ice Extent in North Pole in 31 december 2013 was more than 125 % of US total land area..

Please notice that the estimated figures for Ice Bear north the pole circle is 20-22,000…. this means that each Ice Bear have approximated 560 km2 each to walk on without having to meet an other Ice Bear.

That might not seem a lot when using the scale above. But please remember that the area for New York City is 1.213 km2 which gives a figure af close to half the area of New York City for each individual Polar Bear to walk on.

So Greenpeace and WWF ought to rethink the need for ‘saving the Polar Bears’ and to present where on Earth the collected money has been used!

Please tell us: Where have all the money gone? Money collected due to false information of reality.

Read Full Post »

At the same time Polarwinds once again hit US, the so called experts of CO2 on an mission to study South Pole’s presumed melting and open water found the summer in South Pole more than hard…. the Ice Extent in North Pole by all means was less than some years but still showed figures the CO2-threat believers tried and still tries not to mention……

‘It’s too darn cold’: Historic freeze brings rare danger warning, CNN 2014/01/06 Historic? By all means NO. But the situation doesn’t happen every year only once or twice each person’s lifetime! Please check for correct information still existing on microfiche in Newpapaper’s archives….
Polar Vortex: Temperatures Fall Far, Fast, NYT 2014/01/07
Rekordkölden greppar hårt om norra USA, DN 7 januari 2013

Weather is and has always been a much more complicated thing to make a forecast of than CO2-believers have understood. There are so many more factors involved than are included in so called data models.

Please observe this:
Extent for North Pole Ice 31 december 2013 12.341.252 km2

Compare this with the Area of United States of America approx 9.830.000 km2
This gives us the fact that the Sea Ice Extent in North Pole in 31 december 2013 was more than 125 % of US total land area..

Please notice that the estimated figures for Ice Bear north the pole circle is 20-22,000…. this means that each Ice Bear have approximated 560 km2 each to walk on without having to meet an other Ice Bear.

That might not seem a lot when using the scale above. But please remember that the area for New York City is 1.213 km2 which gives a figure af close to half the area of New York City for each individual Polar Bear to walk on.

So Greenpeace and WWF ought to rethink the need for ‘saving the Polar Bears’ and to present where on Earth the collected money has been used!North Pole Sea Ice Extent 31 dec 2013, Norah4you 2014/01/05

Polarvindar över USA håller isbjörn inomhus, SvD 7 januari 2013 Hur många av världens 20-22.000 isbjörnar har den lyxen? Isbjörnen har aldrig haft de problem som människor velat ge dem. Däremot har isbjörnar problem med alla små partiklar som vår plastanvändning lämnar i havsvattnet.

What we know about Earth
Earth as we know it is 12 756 km in diameter at the equator.
If you take a rope and let 10 km be equal to 1 cm, half the diameter will be 6 meter and 37,8 cm long. Using the rope to draw a circle in sand you will have a large circle. But it’s only the outher parts that we humans have investigated directly. For example Mount Everest can be represented by a small ‘bup’ 0,85 cm high and the Mariner Grave a 1,09 cm down-bup from the line….

We humans have knowledge, to some extent, of what’s inside. We can calculate the Earth’s gravity (oh well the latter has recently been discussed due to black material) and we know what the Earth’s interior largely composed. We know of a number of natural forces, physical laws and mathematical calculation. But by and large, what we know about the Earth can be represented of the outher parts of your drawn circle.

Turisterna stannar inne i kylan, GP 7 januari 2013
Iskyla i centrala USA, Aftonbladet 7 januari 2013

Interesting bloggarticle to be discussed: Does cold wave imply anything about, cliffmass.blogspot.se

Bye bye CO2-threat! Good to see you gone. Time to look into real human made crises. Such as not polluting our water and air. That’s a real problem!

Read Full Post »

BACKGROUND FOR BLOGG ARTICLE
Background for article
What I learnt from the programs mentioned below
A lot of young, young mature as well as educated people under age 50 today lack knowledge enough to understand texts they read. That’s a big problem.
An even worse problem is that a lot of young, young mature as well educated people under age 50 today lack understanding of Mathematic basics. Such as ‘reading’ and understanding Mathematical curves, Statistic and so on.
Article below is written based on this starting point
for more please read note 1

NORTH POLE AND SOUTH POLE ICE EXTENT
IMPACTS

© Johansson Inger E, North Pole and South Pole Ice Extent Impact and understanding, Gothenburg 5th January 2014

Arctic Sea Ice Extent   31 december 2013 source: http://www.ijis.iarc.uaf.edu/en/home/seaice_extent.htm

Arctic Sea Ice Extent
31 december 2013
source: http://www.ijis.iarc.uaf.edu/en/home/seaice_extent.htm

The image above from Arctic Sea Ice Extent, ijis.iarc.uaf.edu is a typical exemple of what all who study Mathematical Statistics are taught not to use. It’s an image not showing the correct proportions. For those who can read curves that might not be an issue. For those who can’t it is.

SEASONAL UPS AND DOWNS IN ICE EXTENT

What’s is important to understand reading the curves is the simple fact that Pole Ice Extent in North Pole as well as South Pole depend on season. Each year the summer ‘heat’ warms up the air and the surface so the Ice Extent decline. Each year the winter ‘colder temperatures’ makes the Ice Extent incline.

IN ACCURATE PRESENTATION OF A CURVE

Please note that the curves not presenting all facts from actual readings from 1980’s up to now. From Theories of Science view this is an red alert at once.

Neither does is it possible to read from image if the reading of a certain day is made at same hour each day or if it’s an average figure counted from max minus min values or if it’s the max or min value of the day. From Theories of Science view this is an red alert at once.

Also please note that the figures, no matter how they are measured calculated and presented, are from readings made by satellites. What can be measured from satellites are reflexion of ice extent. Not actual extent due to the fact that there are large areas in Arctic as well as Antarctic where there during summertime (in Antarctic when it’s winter in Arctic) often exists melted water up to 20 cm over ice no matter if it’s thin ice or several metre thick sea ice. From Theories of Science view this is an red alert!

Same goes for temperature measurements made by satellites. You can’t get temperatures 2 meters above surface nor can you get the actual figures from under the Ice sheet. All correct figures also needs to be taken at same GPS-point no matter when.

If you are accurate you need to do the reading at same time every day. If you don’t or if you try to ”correct” figures, well that’s no Science involved at all. In Theories of Science this is one of the worst fallacies. A circle proof can never ever prove anything of value. That’s one thing every scholar, scientist or otherwise should have learnt before writing a Master thesis…..

COMPARING AREAS

Please observe this:
Extent for North Pole Ice 31 december 2013 12.341.252 km2

Compare this with the Area of United States of America approx 9.830.000 km2
This gives us the fact that the Sea Ice Extent in North Pole in 31 december 2013 was more than 125 % of US total land area..

Please notice that the estimated figures for Ice Bear north the pole circle is 20-22,000…. this means that each Ice Bear have approximated 560 km2 each to walk on without having to meet an other Ice Bear.

That might not seem a lot when using the scale above. But please remember that the area for New York City is 1.213 km2 which gives a figure af close to half the area of New York City for each individual Ice Bear to walk on.

So Greenpeace and WWF ought to rethink the need for ‘saving the Ice Bears’ and to present where on Earth the collected money has been used!

__________________________________________
***************** It’s always good to have the facts correct.
***************** If not, it’s not science but subjective thoughts.

Note 1: correct information regarding why CO2 is measured on vulcanos
Swedish Channel 10 showed a BBC-dokumentary from 2013. In Sweden called Hotet från Mega-TsunamisHotet från Mega-Tsunamis, TV10.se

From geologic facts such as readings of CO2 (please look at the white instrument left of a man, image 1 of 5) placed all round the world on side of vulcanos by geologists used measuser the differences in CO2 in order to be able to predict uprising threats from vulcanos (!) Please remember that all our Earth thousand vulcanos from early days over their active eruptions and still when ‘dead’ vulcano erupts CO2 into the air.

Information re failures of School System in US and Sweden
Also shown on Swedish TV, Channel 4+, was Waiting for ”Superman” An American documentary by David Guggenheim in 2010. The documentary Waiting for Superman analyzes the failure of American Public School system.

The problems shown in the documentary were almost identical to those of Swedens School System. All schools in Sweden are to follow our School Law as well as our official decided Course plans. In Sweden as well as in US we do have Kommunala skolor Public Schools here owned by our towns/ municipalities as well as Friskolor Independent Schools.

ALL schools of Sweden have to follow the decided Course plans. Earlier all schools in Sweden that weren’t Private Schools were under our Swedish States parasolle. Back in 8 december 1989 our Swedish Riksdag Parliament on suggestion of our Minister of Education at the time Göran Persson, later to become Swedish Prime Minister, to place all schools under each town’s/municipalitie’s parasolle.

Thus making it unfair to students in our Grundskola due to the fact that each town/municipality has own rights according to Swedish Grundlaw Constitution to decide on how much money to spend on each town's/municipality's accounts. Using "cheese planner" and "cake server" the amount of money spent on each student today depends on the will of each town/municipality. We do have same problems in class rooms and schools as seen in US.

The learning in a classroom always depends on the teacher's education and commitment as well as on the possibility in class to have good atmosphere, in other word peace and respect. There are good teachers and bad.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »