Consensus is a political term – has nothing what so ever to do with science!
Empiri is reality – corrected data used in computer models NEVER EVER is anything bad: Bad input leads to Bad output. That was we systemprogrammers said back in early 1970’s!
Obama unveils major climate change proposal, cnn.com August 3 2015
“Clean Power Plan:” Pres. Obama unveils major climate change proposal, Gov. Walker responds, fox6now.com 2015/08/03
Almost correct facts can be found in one source for data used by IPCC here it is:
BTW…. this gives every single Polar Bear more than 281 square kilometers each to walk alone on! Not at all the lowest value last 30 year…. I guess you know that this means that each Polar Bear have 50% more area to walk on than the area of Washington DC…. 😛
If you President Obama aren’t familiar with Standard Deviations here is the definition:
Standard Deviation
The Standard Deviation is a measure of how spread out numbers are.
Its symbol is σ (the greek letter sigma)
In other word every value up and down from any kind om mean (there are more than one) that falls within the Standard Deviation, is normal – not abnormal in any way…..
Btw the talk that this years reading was the lowest since 1981 in July is a false statement due to corrected not empiric data. I have all the figures needed and same type of ”reading” via satelites show that the lowest empiric value was back in 2006…. as written in the wattsup blogg I have written comments to in Rebogged article – Ocean Heat: New Study Shows Climate Scientists Can Still Torture Data until the Data Confess, wattsup with that 26 July 2015
YOU HAVE BEEN MADE A FOOL PRESIDENT OBAMA
That’s sad
The CO2-belivers belive but Faith has to do with religion or Faith in a human. They never learnt higher Math, especially not Mathematic Theories, Analyses and never understood that in order to write a systemprogram and or the simplest algoritm, one need to take all important parameters that needs to be answered true into consideration. 7 to 12 of at least 43 NEEDED parameters makes as I wrote above Bad input leads to Bad output. Simple as that.
Science axioms
In Theories of Science it’s never ever possible to prove a thesis right. Only to falsify a thesis
This follows of the most important axiom in Theories of Science:
Each time/period in history needs to rethink and revaluated old accepted theories and thesis from new ”days” advancing analyse methods and/or new facts brought to the ”table”.
Remember that one single black dot on a white paper makes the paper non-white. One single contradiction in a theory is enough for that theory/thesis to be proven wrong.
One single artifact and or factor found in an unexpected place always needs to be folly explained. Or that single artifact/factor leads up to necessarity of formulating a new thesis which includes new knowledge.
Same for thesis in History and Archaeology as for thesis in so called Natural Science.Implications of falsified Thesis
There are several Fallacies in argumentation, Norah4science page English text to be taken into account when ever someone calls for ”consensus”. Consensus is a political term with no connection what so ever to Theories of Science.
Norah4you's Weblog 