Feeds:
Inlägg
Kommentarer

Archive for the ‘Genetik’ Category

Thanks to Genetiker who allows me to reblogg this as so many studies before. I am very greatful

Genetiker

Below is a plot for a K = 13 admixture analysis that includes nine Neolithic genomes from central Asia Minor. The table above the plot gives some information for these samples.

The Pre-Pottery Neolithic samples are similar to the early Neolithic samples from northwestern Asia Minor, while the later Pottery Neolithic samples show more admixture from people like the early inhabitants of Iran and the Caucasus region.

Sample  Period                 Date BC
Bon004  Pre-Pottery Neolithic  > 8300
Bon005  Pre-Pottery Neolithic  8300–8240
Bon002  Pre-Pottery Neolithic  8279–7977
Bon001  Pre-Pottery Neolithic  8212–7952
Tep001  Pottery Neolithic      7500–5800
Tep002  Pottery Neolithic      7500–5800
Tep003  Pottery Neolithic      7500–5800
Tep004  Pottery Neolithic      7500–5800
Tep006  Pottery Neolithic      7500–5800

all-13-14-1

View original post

Annonser

Read Full Post »

A special thanks to Genetiker who allowed me to reblogg his studies. Link to the Y-SNP calls from Neolithic Central Asia Minorz [IEJ: Asia Minor ~ todays Turkey]
———————————————–

Below are Y-SNP calls for Tep001, an Pottery Neolithic sample from the site of Tepecik-Çiftlik in central Asia Minor. Positive calls are in bold, and negative calls are in non-bold. The calls show …

Källa: Y-SNP calls for Tep001

Read Full Post »

Many thanks to Genetiker who allows me to reblogg this as well as Y-SNP calls for Tep001 which had this link within it

Genetiker

In the table below are links to Y-SNP calls for Neolithic samples from central Asia Minor.

Sample  Period                 Date BC    Haplogroup
Bon004  Pre-Pottery Neolithic  > 8300     G2a2b2b-F705      calls
Bon001  Pre-Pottery Neolithic  8212–7952  G2a2b2b1a-PF3422  calls
Tep001  Pottery Neolithic      7500–5800  G, J2, or R1b     calls
Tep006  Pottery Neolithic      7500–5800  C1a2-Y10446       calls

View original post

Read Full Post »

Once again thanks to Genetiker who allows me to reblogg this interesting analyse results.

Genetiker

At the bottom of this post is a plot for a K = 11 admixture analysis of Old World populations. Above it is a plot of the results of projecting Amerindian, Eskimo, and some Eastern Siberian populations onto the components produced by the Old World analysis.

new-world-11-12-1

old-world-11-12-1

View original post

Read Full Post »

A special thanks to Genetiker who allows me to reblogg this interesting results.

Genetiker

Below are derived allele counts and total numbers of reads for SNPs that have a large effect on phenotype for five new ancient genomes from the Zagros Mountains of Iran. Nonzero derived allele counts are in bold. Note that small derived allele counts may be due to DNA damage.

ASIP, rs2424984, Veddoid brown skin

Sample  Period           Date BC    D/T
AH1     Early Neolithic  Unknown    3/3
AH2     Early Neolithic  8205–7756  1/1
AH4     Early Neolithic  8204–7755  0/2
WC1     Early Neolithic  7455–7082  16/16

ASIP, rs6058017, Veddoid brown skin

Sample  Period           Date BC    D/T
AH1     Early Neolithic  Unknown    2/2
WC1     Early Neolithic  7455–7082  15/15
F38     Early Iron Age   971–832    0/2

EDAR, rs3827760, Mongoloid teeth, hair, etc.

Sample  Period           Date BC    D/T
AH1     Early Neolithic  Unknown    0/1
AH2     Early Neolithic  8205–7756  0/1
AH4     Early Neolithic  8204–7755  0/2
WC1     Early Neolithic  7455–7082  0/14
F38     Early Iron Age   971–832    0/5

IRF4, rs12203592, light hair…

View original post 692 fler ord

Read Full Post »

Thanks to Genetiker who let me reblogg this.
Genetiker have by now presented so many essential analysis re Ancient Genome that I during the day will start a new page on my blogg. If you from tomorrow June 30 2016 look up on the top of the blogg you will find an index as well as later on links to information told long ago which most historians believe could have happened but most likely didn’t. Well they were wrong as I see it reading the analysis.

Please read these lines in the article: The plot below shows most European populations as having only small amounts of the Caucasus-related pine green component.

Genetiker

Below is a plot for a K = 13 admixture analysis that includes 45 ancient Near Eastern genomes.

This analysis produced five Caucasoid components. Three of them are similar to components in the preceding K = 12 analysis, while a fourth represents Western European hunter-gatherer DNA, and a fifth represents DNA from the hunter-gatherers of Eastern Europe and Western Siberia, and the later Copper and Bronze Age populations of Eastern Europe.

Over the past week I began to suspect that the Caucasus-related pine green component appearing in large amounts in European samples in my recent K = 13 analyses, which I thought was linked with the spread of R1b-L51 people, was somehow spurious. This analysis, along with others I’ve done over the past few days, confirms my suspicion. The plot below shows most European populations as having only small amounts of the Caucasus-related pine green component.

all-13-8-1

View original post

Read Full Post »

Thanks to Genetiker who let me reblogg this essential serie of information that gives more than I ever expected to the Ancient History and answers for credibility of several written sources from 750 BC on forward. Stories that must have been told from one generation to the next in a long long line of generations.

Genetiker

Below is a plot for a K = 12 admixture analysis that includes 45 ancient Near Eastern genomes.

This analysis produced four Caucasoid components, one peaking in European hunter-gatherers, one in the early Neolithic farmers of Asia Minor and Europe, one in the hunter-gatherers of the Caucasus region, and one in the hunter-gatherers of the Epipaleolithic Natufian culture of the Levant.

The plot shows the Mesolithic R1b, R1a, and J1 hunter-gatherers of Samara and Karelia in Russia as being very similar to the other Mesolithic European hunter-gatherers, but also as having some of the Caucasus-related component. The amount of this component increases in the people of the middle Copper Age Khvalynsk culture, and then increases further in the people of the late Copper Age and early Bronze Age Pit Grave culture.

I may update this post with a new plot if another K = 12 analysis produces what I consider…

View original post 7 fler ord

Read Full Post »

Thanks to Genetiker who let me reblogg this as well as other of his bloggs. Please note that during Copper Age as well as later the notes made above his results for Armenia and Levanten is very very interesting for that partly confirms the later earliest written documentation….

Genetiker

Below is a plot for a K = 11 admixture analysis that includes 45 ancient Near Eastern genomes. The table below gives some information for these samples.

This analysis produced three Caucasoid components. The plot shows that the early Neolithic farmers of Asia Minor were mostly genetically similar to the early farmers of the Levant, but that they had a significant amount of admixture from European hunter-gatherers. This was indicated earlier by the presence of Y haplogroups I2c and C1a2 in some of them.

I may update this post with a new plot if another K = 11 analysis produces what I consider to be a better set of components.

Sample Region Culture Date I1407 Armenia Copper Age 4350–3700 BC I1634 Armenia Copper Age 4330–4060 BC I1631 Armenia Copper Age 4250–4050 BC I1632 Armenia Copper Age 4230–4000 BC I1409 Armenia Copper Age 4229–3985 BC I1658 Armenia Kura-Araxes 3347–3092 BC I1633…

View original post 210 fler ord

Read Full Post »

Thanks to Genetiker who allows me to reblogg this very interesting results re Phenotype SNPs from the ancient Near East.

I am intrigued by the results presented in the blogg because it seem to be in ”correspondence” with some ancient tales of travelling over long distances as well as with artifacts found along the tales’ waterways. It’s more than interesting.

Genetiker

Below are genotypes for SNPs that have a large effect on phenotype for 45 genomes from the ancient Near East. Derived alleles are in bold. These results are based on pseudo-haploid genotype data. I’ll update this post to give derived allele counts when the sequence data for these samples becomes available.

ASIP, rs6058017, Veddoid brown skin

Armenia Copper Age  I1632  GG
Iran Copper Age     I1661  AA
Levant Bronze Age   I1706  AA
Levant Bronze Age   I1730  AA

EDAR, rs3827760, Mongoloid teeth, hair, etc.

 Anatolia Copper Age I1584 AA Armenia Copper Age I1407 AA Armenia Copper Age I1631 AA Armenia Copper Age I1632 AA Armenia Copper Age I1634 AA Armenia Early Bronze Age I1633 AA Armenia Early Bronze Age I1635 AA Armenia Early Bronze Age I1658 AA Armenia Late Bronze Age I1656 AA Iran Copper Age I1661 AA Iran Copper Age I1662 AA Iran Copper Age I1665…

View original post 1 739 fler ord

Read Full Post »

With a special thanks to Genetiker who given me permission to reblogg this excellent article. Please not the Y-haplo groups for prehistoric Eurasian genomes.

Genetiker

In the table below are links to Y-SNP calls for samples from the Neolithic Aegean.

Some of my previous Y chromosome posts are here:

Sample      Region      Period           Years BC   Haplogroup
Barcın 31   Asia Minor  Early Neolithic  6419–6238  G2a2b-L30*     calls
Kleitos 10  Greece      Final Neolithic  4230–3995  G2a2a1a2-L91*  calls

View original post

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »