Please remember one of wattsup blogs I reblogged earlier this year: But, since the middle of 2005 (that would be slightly over 10 years), the arctic sea ice area anomaly has been oscillating steadily at right around -1.0 million sq kilometers. So, whatever 70 year cycle or natural change or polar bear shitte piles caused it to “change” from its 1979-1990 average of +1.0 Mkm^2 to -1.0 Mkm^2, the effect has NOT done ANYTHING to further melt arctic sea ice since 2005. In fact for almost all of the past 18 months, arctic sea ice area has been hovering right at the -2 std deviation levels all the time. Not increasing to be sure, but not decreasing either.True facts presented in comments of ”Gosh a new model based study puts temperature increases caused by CO2 emissions on the map, Wattsup with that 2016/01/20 Have all the money gone to find a model supporting CO2-believers beliefs….. ?????
Also please note that there are those who are so in to the beliefs that they can’t understand that Fictions aren’t Facts….
One of all CO2-believers wrote an article in a Swedish Paper today(obs Swedish text) Trafiken ökar – stick i stäv med klimatmålet, Svante Axelsson
generalsekreterare för Naturskyddsföreningen, GP Debatt 22 February 2016
Guest Opinion: Dr. Tim Ball
A scene from the NYC ”peoples climate march” in September 2014
An interesting pattern developed early in the official involvement in global warming. If a person challenged the claim that humans were causing global warming (AGW), it was assumed they were on the political right. If you supported AGW, then you were on the left. This categorization is not related to the science, but to the political nature of the science involved. This occurred in two major parts. The original objective of those using global warming for their political agenda and the marginalizing of those who questioned the science by linking them to industries and their wealthy owners. The author believes the evidence shows that human CO2 is not causing AGW, that the hypothesis is not proved. This article is not written to pick political sides. Rather, it is an attempt to help understand the…
Visa originalinlägg 1 515 fler ord
[…] Se även https://norah4you.wordpress.com/2016/02/22/are-environmentalism-and-global-warming-effectively-relig… […]
GillaGilla