If it walks like a dog and barks like a dog,
I suggest we call ”it” a dog.
the Global Warming Policy Foundation is not a World Goverment nor a respectable Science Society. For the later it takes understanding that reality rules, consensus is a political not a scientific term. The foundation lack all knowledge of and doesn’t respect of Theories of SciencePeople and Foundations are allowed to be stupied. I don’t think it’s wise to show off being stupied….. do you?
In Sweden media seems to have been indoctrinated…. in other words as elsewhere around the world – people forgotten what erosion is – water erosion, wind erosion, temperature erosion….. and so on.
Paradiset som dränks i vatten, Aftonbladet Eva Franchells ledarkrönika 18 mars 2015
Facts not Political Fiction or Pseudoscience
Erosion is a Natural Force process occuring over time. Everywhere around our Globe coasts and land is effected by Erosion Forcesn, wind, temperature, wave and gravitational erosion are the main erosion sources.Depending on the grounds that ‘country’ is on, so obviously varies erosion impacts on land near areas quite independent of the kind of erosion that in each case is the strongest erosion source. Roughly speaking, it is possible to say that erosion on rock especially old rock types such as granite is smaller than erosion where ground is coral atolls, sand and soil. But it’s obvious.Erosion
The quality in knowledge seems to been lost same time people started to believe that political science/pseudoscience is worth a dime. It isn´t….
The Small Print The Royal Society Left Out
![Royal_Society_350_logo_400x175[1]](https://norah4you.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/royal_society_350_logo_400x17511.jpg){kind=logo}
London, 16 March: A new briefing paper published by the Global Warming Policy Foundation has accused the Royal Society of presenting a misleading picture of climate science.
The briefing, entitled The Small Print: What the Royal Society left out, challenges claims made in the Royal Society’s recently published Short Guide to Climate Science, and demonstrates how the Society has left out many important facts, caveats and doubts on subjects as varied as the causes of climate change, extreme weather and the role of the Sun.
“As an example, the Royal Society addresses the question of why Antarctic sea ice is growing,” says Prof Ross McKitrick, the chairman of the GWPF’s Academic Advisory Council, “but in doing so they present a recently proposed hypothesis as if it were settled science. Failing to admit when the answer to an important question is…
Visa originalinlägg 152 fler ord
Norah4you's Weblog 