Too many so called scholars and politicians using political agenda forgets Theories of Science – Basic Knowledge
such as the most important of all:
Any tempering with data, no matter why and when, aren’t in line with Theories of Science at all.
Remember:
There are several Fallacies in argumentation, Norah4science page English text to be taken into account when ever someone calls for ”consensus”. Consensus is a political term with no connection what so ever to Theories of Science.
As I wrote back in August 2012 (for English text please look below Swedish)
…för ögat osynliga plastpartiklar som förs med dagvatten och avloppsvatten till reningsverk är lika farliga för människors och djurs fertilitet som en del av de hormonämnen vars restprodukter finns kvar även efter alla reningsprocesser i bästa 3-stegs rening som finns!Rent vatten än en gång, Norah4you 2012/08/04
Quick English translation:
”Invisible to Human eye plastic particles are transported in watersystems from consumer out in Oceans. Same goes for plastic particles being transported within wastewater to treatment plants. They are equally dangerous for human and animal fertility as part of the hormonal substances whose residues are retained even after all cleaning processes in the best 3-step purification available!”
Real problem for everyone to be aware of
What goes up in air sooner or later ends up on land/in water and what comes out in watersystem sooner or later ends up in food for animals from Krill all way up in system finally ending in human food.
This is a real threat. No matter if we are discussing hormons we humans use or plastic bags which take several hundred years before ”chemical broken down”, if ever.
CO2-threat isn’t a real threat. It’s a political faith for those who haven’t comprehend that models are models and tempered data always gives bad input and bad output. Without CO2 we humans can’t live. Photosynthesis
but it’s worse than that
Diameter 12 756 km Radie 6 378 km
scale 1 mm=10 000 meter
Red dot represent Mt Everest.
Blue dot Mariana Trench
While Human have been to the Moon, no Human gone deeper than Mariana Trench.
Those who believe in Human caused CO2-fluctation, which by the way is a false assumtion, they better rethink and above all learn what their teacher should have taught them in 7th Grade!
Of course Faith is personal. In reality of Science Empiri beats models. The new Faith of IPCC: Humans are Universe’s centre
Real problem – Clean water without plastic and/or chemical polution>
Swedish media: Miljontals ton plast i haven, GP 13 februari 2015
Så mycket plast dumpas årligen i haven, DN 13 februari 2015
Klimatet kräver modiga politiker och stora insatser, Christian Azar professor Energi och Miljö Chalmers samt Daniel Johansson docent i klimat-vetenskapliga analyser Chalmers på GP Debatt 15 februari 2015 De båda herrarna har antingen inte lärt in Vetenskapsteori eller också glömt. De begår tre av de allvarligste Fallacien, något verkligt kunniga vetenskapsmän ALDRIG skulle göra! Sedan må de ha fina titlar. Men det de glömt är att följande är allvarliga <A HREF="https://norah4science.wordpress.com/fallacies-in-argumentation-english-text/Fallacies in argumentationoch inget annat:
* Argumentum ab auctoritate”
Authority is no safe criterion of credibility.
* Fallacy from usage of insound premisses
* ”Appeal to fear
Have been commonly used by alarmists of Climate Threats – often combined with usage of chosen/incomplete data; models where not all input factors are included. Bad input always results in bad output.
Tillägg 10 mars 2015….
Verkar som svenska intresseorganisationer och ”forskare” som vanligt vill verka vara bäst i klassen.. 🙂
Grön investeringsbank nödvändig för klimatet, Svante Axelsson generalsekr. Naturskyddsföreningen, Svenne Junker doktor företagsekonomi Handelshögskolan i Stockholm samt Joakim Sandberg docent Göteborgs universitet m.m. på GP Debatt 10 mars 2015
Lär sig inte herrarna vetenskapsteori kapitel fallacies numera?
