When will the CO2-believers ever learn that Consensus is a political not a Scientific term….
Here in Sweden in our Monty Pyton alike Socialdemocratic + Green Goverment Löfvén var i the Daily Show för att prata om att bilda stabil politisk situation
there is a lady, well not acting like a lady nor having the education a normal lady of today is supposed to have…. but anyhow she is Green in words not acting the same way herself Åsa Romsons samvete rymligt…. ….. but still, she has the position of Environmental Minister not understanding that her belief in IPCC has been shown to be a false Faith….The new Faith of IPCC: Humans are Universes centre
When will she ever learn? Probably never…. 😛
The 97% ”consensus” study, Cook et al. (2013) has been thoroughly refuted in scholarly peer-reviewed journals, by major news media, public policy organizations and think tanks, highly credentialed scientists and extensively in the climate blogosphere. The shoddy methodology of Cook’s study has been shown to be so fatally flawed that well known climate scientists have publicly spoken out against it,
”The ‘97% consensus’ article is poorly conceived, poorly designed and poorly executed. It obscures the complexities of the climate issue and it is a sign of the desperately poor level of public and policy debate in this country [UK] that the energy minister should cite it.”
The following is a list of 97 articles that refute Cook’s (poorly conceived, poorly designed and poorly executed) 97% ”consensus” study. The fact that anyone continues to bring up…
View original post 1 677 fler ord