Why am I not surprised? As time goes by and the low quality of other so called scholars studies been presented, one by one, I have reached a conclusion. IPCC and their ”scholars” are persons of Faith not persons of solid sound science….
It didn’t take long for the warmists to go from Thesis using Fallacies instead of Theories of Science to the present situation where IPCC acts same way as Christian Church leaders did in Medival Age and up to present. Of course(?) Humans must be the ones around which the sun and universe rotate 😛IPCC preparing ‘most important’ document on climate change,bbs science environment 30 October 2014
10 important findings from the IPCC-reports, 350.org homepage Where have all the money gone?
9 significant scientific findings too recent to be included new IPCC-report, ”World resorces institute”October 30 2014 Haven’t anyone of them studied more than Fallacies in subject Theories of Science? Who told them that Fallacies were/are legitim sound science????
Pseudo scientists are by no mean true to Theories of Science quote from The new faith of IPCC: Humans are Universe centre, Norah4you 204/10/31
as I wrote in comment below: Someone ought to have sent the so called scientists in question on a Theory of Science course….. had been cheeper and had at least had a chance leading up to better knowledge….Is it to this undergrade so called studies the Money have gone? Please enlighten us where the rest of the Money gone….
Swedish media.
”Kyotoprotokollet har varit direkt skadligt – byt spår”, professor John Hassler Inst. för internationell ekonomi Stockholms universitet, professor Per Krusell Inst. för internationell ekonomi Stockholms universitet and professor Jonas Nycander Meteorologiska inst. Stockholms universitet, på DN Debatt 2 november 2014
Need I remind you reading this of one of the worst fallacies in Argumentation:argumentum ab auctoritate
Professor X, Professor of Science A presents an argumentation for a thesis. You need to remember that due to the thesis being presented by a professor. That goes for all cases, whether this professor pronounce him-/herself within his/her own scientific field or in other science fields. A thesis or an argument presented by a professor does not mean that the professor is credible because he is a professor. In other words: It does not necessarily mean that the professor’s statement, even if it is within his own territory, is sound and free from biases as well as independent of the influence of research grants from the interest group. Business, individual interest groups, etc. Authority is no safe criterion of credibility.
For non-Swedish readers I might have to add the odd situation in Swedish Science – The only Academic position, title, where quality of presented academic work or need to have written such aren’t called for is the Professor-position. I have no idea what so ever which real Academic work the article’s professors written, nor their quality – but I do know that Economic isn’t among the 43 needed parameters for establishing CO2, ”heat” on Earth and sealevels ….. 😉”Byt spår i Klimatpolitiken”, GP 2 november 2014
Ny varning från FN:s klimatpanel, SvD 2 november 2014
Ny varning från FN:s klimatpanel, Aftonbladet 2 november 2014
From the American Journal of Botany
Inexpensive tidal simulator allows ecological studies of tidal marsh plants
Rachel MacTavish is growing salt marsh plants in microcosms that replicate the tide. She assembled them in an outdoor greenhouse at the Sapelo Island National Estuarine Research Reserve in Georgia, USA, with buckets from a hardware store, aquarium tubing, and pumps. Her tidal simulation units could be an important tool for preserving and restoring environmentally important wetlands, because they enable researchers to investigate tidal marsh plant growth in a controlled setting.
”Tidal wetlands are often influenced by many factors, and controlled experiments allow researchers to isolate and untangle the roles of individual variables,” explains MacTavish, a graduate student in the Department of Biology at Georgia Southern University. ”I was inspired to construct and test this tidal simulation method as a way to examine the effects of added nutrients and salt in the water on…
Visa originalinlägg 312 fler ord
Norah4you's Weblog 